Researching Certified E-Waste Recycling Options

Researching Certified E-Waste Recycling Options

Overview of typical electronic devices and their functions

In today's digital age, the proliferation of electronic devices is both a marvel and a challenge. Their services contribute to maintaining clean and organized spaces commercial junk sea turtles. As technology rapidly evolves, our gadgets become obsolete at an unprecedented pace, leading to a surge in electronic waste, or e-waste. This burgeoning issue necessitates a conscientious approach to disposal and recycling, underscoring the importance of certified e-waste recycling.


Certified e-waste recycling is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it addresses the environmental impact of discarded electronics. E-waste contains hazardous materials like lead, mercury, and cadmium that can leach into soil and water if not properly managed. Certified recyclers adhere to strict environmental standards to safely process these toxins, preventing contamination and protecting ecosystems.


Secondly, certified recycling helps conserve natural resources. Many electronic products contain valuable metals such as gold, silver, and copper. Through effective recycling processes, these materials can be recovered and reused in new products, reducing the need for mining and conserving finite resources. This not only supports environmental sustainability but also contributes to economic efficiency by lowering production costs.


The social implications of certified e-waste recycling are equally significant. Choosing certified facilities ensures that recyclers adhere to ethical labor practices and safety standards. This is particularly important given reports of unsafe working conditions in some informal recycling sectors around the world where workers are exposed to toxic substances without proper protection.


Moreover, certified e-waste recycling fosters innovation in waste management technologies. It drives research into more efficient methods for dismantling and processing electronics, encouraging advancements that can further reduce the ecological footprint of our digital lifestyle.


When researching certified e-waste recycling options, consumers play a pivotal role in this ecosystem. By selecting services that have received certification from recognized bodies such as e-Stewards or R2 (Responsible Recycling), individuals can ensure their discarded electronics are handled responsibly.


Choosing certified recyclers involves verifying credentials and understanding the recycler's processes for handling different types of e-waste. It's essential to look for transparency in operations-reputable companies will readily share their certifications and explain how they manage end-of-life electronics securely and sustainably.


In conclusion, certified e-waste recycling is an indispensable practice in managing one of our era's most pressing environmental challenges-electronic waste. By supporting certified recyclers through informed choices during disposal, we contribute not only to environmental conservation but also to ethical labor practices and resource efficiency. As responsible stewards of technology's legacy on Earth, it's incumbent upon us all to prioritize sustainable solutions like certified e-waste recycling as part of our broader commitment to safeguarding our planet's future.

In an era marked by rapid technological advancement, the proliferation of electronic waste, or e-waste, poses a significant environmental challenge. As consumers continuously upgrade their gadgets and devices, the question arises: what happens to the discarded electronics? Understanding the certification process for e-waste recyclers is crucial for ensuring that these materials are handled in an environmentally responsible manner. This knowledge not only empowers consumers but also contributes to sustainable practices that mitigate the harmful effects of e-waste.


E-waste consists of discarded electronic appliances such as smartphones, computers, televisions, and other digital devices. These items contain hazardous substances like lead, mercury, and cadmium that can leach into soil and water when improperly disposed of. The need for certified recycling facilities becomes evident when considering these potential environmental risks. Certified e-waste recyclers adhere to strict standards and guidelines established by recognized organizations to ensure safe handling, processing, and disposal of electronic waste.


One pivotal aspect of researching certified e-waste recycling options is understanding the various certifications available. Two prominent certifications are R2 (Responsible Recycling) and e-Stewards. The R2 certification focuses on promoting responsible recycling practices by emphasizing data security measures, environment-friendly processes, worker safety protocols, and transparency in operations. Meanwhile, the e-Stewards certification goes a step further by prohibiting certain exportation practices deemed hazardous under international conventions and emphasizing social responsibility along with environmental sustainability.


When selecting a certified recycler, it is essential to verify their credentials through reliable sources. Consumers can access online databases maintained by certifying bodies to cross-check whether a recycler holds current certification status. Additionally, seeking out consumer reviews or testimonials regarding their services can offer insights into their reliability and adherence to ethical practices.


Furthermore, understanding how these recyclers manage different types of electronic waste is critical in making informed choices. Some facilities specialize in particular categories of e-waste while others may offer comprehensive solutions covering a wide range of products from small household items to large industrial equipment. Inquiring about specific processes they employ-such as shredding versus dismantling-can provide clarity on how effectively they minimize environmental impact during recycling operations.


Beyond individual action lies an opportunity for collective change: advocating for increased awareness about certified e-waste recycling options among communities encourages broader participation in proper disposal methods that benefit both society at large and future generations alike.




Researching Certified E-Waste Recycling Options - reuse

  1. price
  2. oil
  3. box

In conclusion, comprehending the certification process for e-waste recyclers forms an integral part of addressing global concerns surrounding electronic waste management sustainably-and responsibly choosing who handles our obsolete gadgets matters immensely! By doing so diligently through research into accredited programs like R2 or e-Stewards certifications alongside verifying credentials via authoritative channels ensures not only peace-of-mind but actively assists preservation efforts toward protecting our planet's well-being against mounting ecological threats posed by ever-growing piles upon piles left unchecked otherwise without intervention today more than ever before necessary now more truly than perhaps any previous time imaginable across history itself!

Challenges and Opportunities in Scaling Up Global E-Waste Processing Networks

Challenges and Opportunities in Scaling Up Global E-Waste Processing Networks

The rapid advancement of technology has been both a boon and a bane for the modern world.. On one hand, it has revolutionized communication, education, and commerce; on the other, it has led to an unprecedented surge in electronic waste (e-waste).

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Governments Introduce Subsidies to Boost E-Waste Processing Facilities

Governments Introduce Subsidies to Boost E-Waste Processing Facilities

The issue of electronic waste, commonly referred to as e-waste, has become increasingly pressing in our modern digital age.. As technology advances at a rapid pace, older devices quickly become obsolete, leading to an ever-growing pile of discarded electronics.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Debate Over Fair Fee Structures in Junk Removal Highlights Regional Disparities

Debate Over Fair Fee Structures in Junk Removal Highlights Regional Disparities

The debate over fair fee structures in junk removal services has become increasingly prominent, particularly as regional disparities highlight the need for equitable pricing models.. As communities grapple with varying economic realities, developing proposed solutions and approaches to establish fair pricing is essential to ensure that all individuals have access to necessary waste management services. One proposed solution is the implementation of a tiered pricing system based on income levels and regional cost of living.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

E-Waste Management Industry Grows Amid Push for Sustainable Electronics Recycling

E-Waste Management Industry Grows Amid Push for Sustainable Electronics Recycling

The e-waste management industry stands at a pivotal juncture, poised for transformative growth as global emphasis on sustainable practices intensifies.. As the world becomes increasingly digitized, the proliferation of electronic devices has led to a corresponding surge in electronic waste.

Posted by on 2024-12-07

Stages of the Electronic Device Lifecycle

In the modern world, where technological advancements are rapidly evolving, the issue of electronic waste (e-waste) has emerged as a significant environmental and health concern. With the incessant pace of new gadgets and the quick obsolescence of electronics, proper disposal of e-waste is crucial to mitigate its harmful effects. Therefore, researching certified e-waste recycling options has become an imperative task for individuals and organizations alike. The evaluation criteria for these recycling options are vital to ensure that they meet environmental standards while also being efficient and sustainable.




Researching Certified E-Waste Recycling Options - waste management

  1. College HUNKS Hauling Junk & Moving
  2. pricing
  3. Google

The first criterion for evaluating e-waste recycling options is compliance with environmental regulations. Certified recyclers must adhere to local, national, and international laws governing e-waste management. These regulations are designed to minimize the release of toxic substances such as lead, mercury, and cadmium into the environment. Ensuring compliance not only protects ecosystems but also safeguards human health from potential exposure to hazardous materials. It is essential to verify that a recycler holds relevant certifications such as R2 (Responsible Recycling) or e-Stewards certification, which indicate adherence to stringent environmental standards.


Another critical criterion is the recycler's transparency in operations. A responsible e-waste recycler should be open about their processes, providing detailed information on how they handle different types of electronic waste. Transparency includes disclosing downstream partners who further process or dispose of materials that cannot be recycled in-house. This openness builds trust with clients and ensures accountability throughout the entire recycling chain.


Efficiency in resource recovery is also a key factor when evaluating e-waste recycling options. An effective recycler should maximize material recovery while minimizing residual waste sent to landfills. Advanced technologies like automated sorting systems can enhance efficiency by accurately separating valuable materials such as precious metals from non-recyclable components. The ability to efficiently recover resources not only reduces environmental impact but also contributes to economic sustainability by reintroducing valuable materials back into production cycles.


In addition to operational efficiency, evaluating a recycler's commitment to ethical practices is paramount. This involves assessing whether the company respects labor rights and provides fair working conditions for its employees at all stages of the recycling process. Ethical practices extend beyond immediate operations; they include ensuring that exported e-waste does not contribute to unsafe working environments in developing countries where regulation enforcement may be lax.


Finally, customer service quality should not be overlooked when choosing an e-waste recycler. A reliable service provider will offer clear communication channels and responsive support throughout each stage of collection and processing. They should provide comprehensive reporting on recycled quantities and destinations for complete transparency about what happens with your discarded electronics.


In conclusion, selecting a certified e-waste recycler requires careful consideration across several dimensions: regulatory compliance, operational transparency, resource recovery efficiency, ethical practices, and customer service quality are essential criteria guiding this decision-making process effectively addressing both environmental concerns associated with improper disposal methods while promoting sustainable practices within our technologically driven society becomes possible through diligent research into certified options available today ultimately contributing positively towards achieving global sustainability goals protecting future generations from potential harm caused by burgeoning piles electronic refuse worldwide

Stages of the Electronic Device Lifecycle

Design and manufacturing processes

In an era where technology is rapidly advancing, the accumulation of electronic waste, or e-waste, has become a significant environmental concern. Disposed gadgets and devices contain hazardous materials that can harm both ecosystems and human health if not handled properly. Hence, choosing certified e-waste recycling facilities has become increasingly important. These facilities not only offer a solution to the mounting problem of e-waste but also provide numerous benefits that make them an essential component in sustainable waste management practices.


Certified e-waste recycling facilities are bound by strict regulations and standards designed to ensure that electronics are disposed of safely and efficiently. One of the primary benefits of opting for such facilities is their commitment to environmental protection. Certified recyclers employ advanced techniques to dismantle electronic items and recover valuable materials like copper, gold, and silver. This process minimizes the need for resource extraction from natural reserves, significantly reducing environmental degradation.


Moreover, these facilities are equipped to handle toxic substances contained in electronic devices-such as lead, mercury, and cadmium-in a manner that prevents them from leaching into soil and water systems. This careful handling reduces the risk of contaminating local environments and safeguards public health.


Choosing certified e-waste recycling options also supports economic sustainability through job creation. Recycling centers often require skilled labor for sorting, dismantling, and processing electronic components. By supporting these facilities, communities can foster local employment opportunities while simultaneously promoting environmentally responsible practices.


Another compelling advantage is data security assurance when disposing of old electronics containing personal information. Certified recycling centers adhere to stringent data destruction protocols which safeguard against unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information stored on devices like computers or smartphones.


Additionally, engaging with certified recyclers can enhance corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives for businesses aiming to project an image of environmental stewardship. Companies that prioritize responsible disposal methods demonstrate their commitment to sustainability goals which can improve brand reputation among eco-conscious consumers.


Furthermore, individuals who choose certified e-waste recycling contribute significantly towards achieving global sustainability targets set by international agreements such as the Basel Convention on hazardous wastes management. By ensuring proper disposal methods are followed at every stage-from collection through processing-these efforts collectively reduce the harmful impact of e-waste on our planet.


In conclusion, as we navigate an increasingly digital world with ever-growing piles of discarded electronics threatening our environment, choosing certified e-waste recycling facilities emerges as a crucial step forward in addressing this challenge responsibly. Through environmental protection measures combined with economic benefits like job creation and enhanced data security protocols-alongside fulfilling CSR objectives-certified recyclers offer comprehensive solutions necessary for managing today's complex waste landscape effectively while paving pathways toward a more sustainable future for generations ahead.

Usage phase: maintenance and longevity

In today's rapidly advancing technological world, electronic waste, commonly known as e-waste, presents a formidable challenge for environmental and public health. As consumers upgrade their gadgets with increasing frequency, the accumulation of obsolete electronics has become an overwhelming issue. Despite efforts to manage this growing problem, significant challenges remain in the current e-waste recycling landscape. In particular, researching certified e-waste recycling options reveals numerous obstacles that need to be addressed to improve sustainability and safety.


One of the primary challenges in the current e-waste recycling landscape is the lack of standardized regulations across different regions. This inconsistency often leads to confusion among consumers about where and how to dispose of their old electronics responsibly. While some countries have developed comprehensive legislation mandating certified recycling processes, others lag behind, resulting in a fragmented global approach that hinders effective management. Consequently, illegal dumping and informal recycling practices continue to thrive, exacerbating environmental pollution and posing health risks to communities involved in these activities.


Another major obstacle is the insufficient awareness among consumers regarding certified e-waste recycling options. Many individuals remain unaware of what constitutes responsible disposal or how they can access certified recyclers. This knowledge gap results in low participation rates in formal recycling programs, further contributing to the proliferation of e-waste in landfills and unregulated sectors. Public education campaigns are crucial but often underfunded or inadequately implemented, leaving many people uninformed about their role in mitigating this crisis.


Moreover, even when consumers are informed about certified options, logistical barriers frequently deter them from participating in proper e-waste disposal practices. The convenience factor plays a significant role; if it is not easy for individuals to recycle their electronics responsibly-whether due to location constraints or limited drop-off points-they are more likely to resort to improper methods out of sheer practicality. Enhancing infrastructure and making certified recycling facilities more accessible can help overcome this hurdle.


The economic viability of certified e-waste recycling operations also poses a challenge within the current landscape. The complex nature of dismantling electronic products safely requires specialized equipment and skilled labor-factors that drive up costs for legitimate recyclers compared to informal operators who bypass safety protocols. Without sufficient financial incentives or support from governments and industry stakeholders, many certified recyclers struggle to compete economically while maintaining environmentally sound practices.


Finally, there is an ongoing need for innovation within the sector itself. As technology evolves at breakneck speed, so too do materials used in electronic products-some of which present unique difficulties during the recycling process due to their hazardous nature or complexity. Continued research into advanced methodologies that can efficiently extract valuable components while minimizing harmful emissions will be essential moving forward.


In conclusion, navigating through these multifaceted challenges requires concerted efforts from governments worldwide alongside active participation from corporations and consumers alike. By standardizing regulations globally; raising awareness about responsible disposal options; improving logistical frameworks; supporting economic sustainability for legitimate operations; and fostering innovation within waste management technologies-we can make strides towards overcoming obstacles present within today's e-waste recycling landscape ultimately paving way toward sustainable future .

End-of-Life Management for Electronic Devices

In recent years, the global concern over electronic waste, or e-waste, has grown significantly. As technology advances at a rapid pace, the lifespan of electronic devices becomes increasingly short, leading to an accumulation of discarded gadgets and appliances.

Researching Certified E-Waste Recycling Options - waste management

  1. reuse
  2. Atco Records
  3. waste management
This poses a serious environmental challenge due to the hazardous materials that can leach into ecosystems from improperly disposed electronics. To combat this issue, certified e-waste recycling programs have emerged as beacons of hope, offering sustainable solutions for managing this modern dilemma.


One exemplary case study is that of Switzerland's e-waste recycling program. Switzerland boasts one of the highest e-waste recycling rates in the world, achieving nearly 95% recovery. The success of their program lies in its comprehensive approach: stringent legislation mandates that all electronic waste must be returned to designated collection points. Moreover, producers are held accountable through Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which requires them to finance the collection and environmentally sound disposal of their products. This collaborative effort between government authorities and industry players ensures compliance and fosters a culture of responsibility among consumers.


Similarly, Japan's Home Appliance Recycling Law provides another successful model for e-waste management. This law stipulates that manufacturers collect and recycle specific household appliances such as televisions and refrigerators at their end-of-life stage. By implementing a clear framework for product take-back and recycling processes, Japan not only reduces its environmental footprint but also encourages manufacturers to design more easily recyclable products-a critical step towards achieving a circular economy.


Moving across continents, South Africa's innovative approach with its National E-Waste Association showcases how developing nations can effectively manage e-waste challenges despite economic constraints. With limited resources compared to some Western countries, South Africa focuses on creating awareness campaigns and public-private partnerships to enhance collection efforts and improve recycling infrastructure. These initiatives empower local communities by providing job opportunities in the growing field of e-waste management while simultaneously safeguarding natural habitats from contamination.


In North America, Canada demonstrates significant progress through its Electronics Product Stewardship Canada (EPSC) program. EPSC emphasizes collaboration among manufacturers, retailers, governments, and consumers alike-each playing an integral role in diverting electronics from landfills into certified recycling facilities where valuable materials are recovered safely without harming workers or environments surrounding them.


These case studies underscore several key elements that contribute towards successful certified e-waste recycling programs globally: robust legislative frameworks enforcing producer accountability; public awareness campaigns promoting responsible consumer behavior; effective partnerships between private sectors & governmental bodies; investment into cutting-edge technologies facilitating efficient resource recovery processes-all essential components driving positive change within this sector worldwide.


As we continue researching certified options available today for tackling our ever-growing mountain pileup filled with obsolete gadgets-a topic demanding urgent attention-it becomes evident how crucial adopting these best practices will be if we aim not only mitigate harmful impacts associated unchecked proliferation toxic debris but also harness opportunities presented therein create sustainable industries future generations benefit long term!

 

A landfill in Łubna, Poland in 1999

A landfill[a] is a site for the disposal of waste materials. It is the oldest and most common form of waste disposal, although the systematic burial of waste with daily, intermediate and final covers only began in the 1940s. In the past, waste was simply left in piles or thrown into pits (known in archeology as middens).

Landfills take up a lot of land and pose environmental risks. Some landfill sites are used for waste management purposes, such as temporary storage, consolidation and transfer, or for various stages of processing waste material, such as sorting, treatment, or recycling. Unless they are stabilized, landfills may undergo severe shaking or soil liquefaction of the ground during an earthquake. Once full, the area over a landfill site may be reclaimed for other uses.

Operations

[edit]
One of several landfills used by Dryden, Ontario, Canada
Garbage dumped in the middle of a road in Karachi, Pakistan

Operators of well-run landfills for non-hazardous waste meet predefined specifications by applying techniques to:[1]

  1. confine waste to as small an area as possible
  2. compact waste to reduce volume[2]

They can also cover waste (usually daily) with layers of soil or other types of material such as woodchips and fine particles.

During landfill operations, a scale or weighbridge may weigh waste collection vehicles on arrival and personnel may inspect loads for wastes that do not accord with the landfill's waste-acceptance criteria.[2] Afterward, the waste collection vehicles use the existing road network on their way to the tipping face or working front, where they unload their contents. After loads are deposited, compactors or bulldozers can spread and compact the waste on the working face. Before leaving the landfill boundaries, the waste collection vehicles may pass through a wheel-cleaning facility. If necessary, they return to the weighbridge for re-weighing without their load. The weighing process can assemble statistics on the daily incoming waste tonnage, which databases can retain for record keeping. In addition to trucks, some landfills may have equipment to handle railroad containers. The use of "rail-haul" permits landfills to be located at more remote sites, without the problems associated with many truck trips.

Typically, in the working face, the compacted waste is covered with soil or alternative materials daily. Alternative waste-cover materials include chipped wood or other "green waste",[3] several sprayed-on foam products, chemically "fixed" bio-solids, and temporary blankets. Blankets can be lifted into place at night and then removed the following day prior to waste placement. The space that is occupied daily by the compacted waste and the cover material is called a daily cell. Waste compaction is critical to extending the life of the landfill. Factors such as waste compressibility, waste-layer thickness and the number of passes of the compactor over the waste affect the waste densities.

Sanitary landfill life cycle

[edit]
Sanitary landfill diagram

The term landfill is usually shorthand for a municipal landfill or sanitary landfill. These facilities were first introduced early in the 20th century, but gained wide use in the 1960s and 1970s, in an effort to eliminate open dumps and other "unsanitary" waste disposal practices. The sanitary landfill is an engineered facility that separates and confines waste. Sanitary landfills are intended as biological reactors (bioreactors) in which microbes will break down complex organic waste into simpler, less toxic compounds over time. These reactors must be designed and operated according to regulatory standards and guidelines (See environmental engineering).

Usually, aerobic decomposition is the first stage by which wastes are broken down in a landfill. These are followed by four stages of anaerobic degradation. Usually, solid organic material in solid phase decays rapidly as larger organic molecules degrade into smaller molecules. These smaller organic molecules begin to dissolve and move to the liquid phase, followed by hydrolysis of these organic molecules, and the hydrolyzed compounds then undergo transformation and volatilization as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), with rest of the waste remaining in solid and liquid phases.

During the early phases, little material volume reaches the leachate, as the biodegradable organic matter of the waste undergoes a rapid decrease in volume. Meanwhile, the leachate's chemical oxygen demand increases with increasing concentrations of the more recalcitrant compounds compared to the more reactive compounds in the leachate. Successful conversion and stabilization of the waste depend on how well microbial populations function in syntrophy, i.e. an interaction of different populations to provide each other's nutritional needs.:[4]

The life cycle of a municipal landfill undergoes five distinct phases:[5][4]

Initial adjustment (Phase I)

[edit]

As the waste is placed in the landfill, the void spaces contain high volumes of molecular oxygen (O2). With added and compacted wastes, the O2 content of the landfill bioreactor strata gradually decreases. Microbial populations grow, density increases. Aerobic biodegradation dominates, i.e. the primary electron acceptor is O2.

Transition (Phase II)

[edit]

The O2 is rapidly degraded by the existing microbial populations. The decreasing O2 leads to less aerobic and more anaerobic conditions in the layers. The primary electron acceptors during transition are nitrates and sulphates since O2 is rapidly displaced by CO2 in the effluent gas.

Acid formation (Phase III)

[edit]

Hydrolysis of the biodegradable fraction of the solid waste begins in the acid formation phase, which leads to rapid accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in the leachate. The increased organic acid content decreases the leachate pH from approximately 7.5 to 5.6. During this phase, the decomposition intermediate compounds like the VFAs contribute much chemical oxygen demand (COD). Long-chain volatile organic acids (VOAs) are converted to acetic acid (C2H4O2), CO2, and hydrogen gas (H2). High concentrations of VFAs increase both the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and VOA concentrations, which initiates H2 production by fermentative bacteria, which stimulates the growth of H2-oxidizing bacteria. The H2 generation phase is relatively short because it is complete by the end of the acid formation phase. The increase in the biomass of acidogenic bacteria increases the amount of degradation of the waste material and consuming nutrients. Metals, which are generally more water-soluble at lower pH, may become more mobile during this phase, leading to increasing metal concentrations in the leachate.

Methane fermentation (Phase IV)

[edit]

The acid formation phase intermediary products (e.g., acetic, propionic, and butyric acids) are converted to CH4 and CO2 by methanogenic microorganisms. As VFAs are metabolized by the methanogens, the landfill water pH returns to neutrality. The leachate's organic strength, expressed as oxygen demand, decreases at a rapid rate with increases in CH4 and CO2 gas production. This is the longest decomposition phase.

Final maturation and stabilization (Phase V)

[edit]

The rate of microbiological activity slows during the last phase of waste decomposition as the supply of nutrients limits the chemical reactions, e.g. as bioavailable phosphorus becomes increasingly scarce. CH4 production almost completely disappears, with O2 and oxidized species gradually reappearing in the gas wells as O2 permeates downwardly from the troposphere. This transforms the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) in the leachate toward oxidative processes. The residual organic materials may incrementally be converted to the gas phase, and as organic matter is composted; i.e. the organic matter is converted to humic-like compounds.[6]

Social and environmental impact

[edit]
Landfill operation in Hawaii. The area being filled is a single, well-defined "cell" and a protective landfill liner is in place (exposed on the left) to prevent contamination by leachates migrating downward through the underlying geological formation.

Landfills have the potential to cause a number of issues. Infrastructure disruption, such as damage to access roads by heavy vehicles, may occur. Pollution of local roads and watercourses from wheels on vehicles when they leave the landfill can be significant and can be mitigated by wheel washing systems. Pollution of the local environment, such as contamination of groundwater or aquifers or soil contamination may occur, as well.

Leachate

[edit]

When precipitation falls on open landfills, water percolates through the garbage and becomes contaminated with suspended and dissolved material, forming leachate. If this is not contained it can contaminate groundwater. All modern landfill sites use a combination of impermeable liners several metres thick, geologically stable sites and collection systems to contain and capture this leachate. It can then be treated and evaporated. Once a landfill site is full, it is sealed off to prevent precipitation ingress and new leachate formation. However, liners must have a lifespan, be it several hundred years or more. Eventually, any landfill liner could leak,[7] so the ground around landfills must be tested for leachate to prevent pollutants from contaminating groundwater.

Decomposition gases

[edit]

Rotting food and other decaying organic waste create decomposition gases, especially CO2 and CH4 from aerobic and anaerobic decomposition, respectively. Both processes occur simultaneously in different parts of a landfill. In addition to available O2, the fraction of gas constituents will vary, depending on the age of landfill, type of waste, moisture content and other factors. For example, the maximum amount of landfill gas produced can be illustrated a simplified net reaction of diethyl oxalate that accounts for these simultaneous reactions:[8]

4 C6H10O4 + 6 H2O → 13 CH4 + 11 CO2

On average, about half of the volumetric concentration of landfill gas is CH4 and slightly less than half is CO2. The gas also contains about 5% molecular nitrogen (N2), less than 1% hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and a low concentration of non-methane organic compounds (NMOC), about 2700 ppmv.[8]

Waste disposal in Athens, Greece

Landfill gases can seep out of the landfill and into the surrounding air and soil. Methane is a greenhouse gas, and is flammable and potentially explosive at certain concentrations, which makes it perfect for burning to generate electricity cleanly. Since decomposing plant matter and food waste only release carbon that has been captured from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, no new carbon enters the carbon cycle and the atmospheric concentration of CO2 is not affected. Carbon dioxide traps heat in the atmosphere, contributing to climate change.[9] In properly managed landfills, gas is collected and flared or recovered for landfill gas utilization.

Vectors

[edit]

Poorly run landfills may become nuisances because of vectors such as rats and flies which can spread infectious diseases. The occurrence of such vectors can be mitigated through the use of daily cover.

Other nuisances

[edit]
A group of wild elephants interacting with a trash dump in Sri Lanka

Other potential issues include wildlife disruption due to occupation of habitat[10] and animal health disruption caused by consuming waste from landfills,[11] dust, odor, noise pollution, and reduced local property values.

Landfill gas

[edit]
A gas flare produced by a landfill in Lake County, Ohio

Gases are produced in landfills due to the anaerobic digestion by microbes. In a properly managed landfill, this gas is collected and used. Its uses range from simple flaring to the landfill gas utilization and generation of electricity. Landfill gas monitoring alerts workers to the presence of a build-up of gases to a harmful level. In some countries, landfill gas recovery is extensive; in the United States, for example, more than 850 landfills have active landfill gas recovery systems.[12]

Solar landfill

[edit]
Solar arrays on a full landfill in Rehoboth, MA

A Solar landfill is a repurposed used landfill that is converted to a solar array solar farm.[13]

Regional practice

[edit]
A landfill in Perth, Western Australia
South East New Territories Landfill, Hong Kong

Canada

[edit]

Landfills in Canada are regulated by provincial environmental agencies and environmental protection legislation.[14] Older facilities tend to fall under current standards and are monitored for leaching.[15] Some former locations have been converted to parkland.

European Union

[edit]
The Rusko landfill in Oulu, Finland

In the European Union, individual states are obliged to enact legislation to comply with the requirements and obligations of the European Landfill Directive.

The majority of EU member states have laws banning or severely restricting the disposal of household trash via landfills.[16]

India

[edit]

Landfilling is currently the major method of municipal waste disposal in India. India also has Asia's largest dumping ground in Deonar, Mumbai.[17] However, issues frequently arise due to the alarming growth rate of landfills and poor management by authorities.[18] On and under surface fires have been commonly seen in the Indian landfills over the last few years.[17]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Landfilling practices in the UK have had to change in recent years to meet the challenges of the European Landfill Directive. The UK now imposes landfill tax upon biodegradable waste which is put into landfills. In addition to this the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme has been established for local authorities to trade landfill quotas in England. A different system operates in Wales where authorities cannot 'trade' amongst themselves, but have allowances known as the Landfill Allowance Scheme.

United States

[edit]

U.S. landfills are regulated by each state's environmental agency, which establishes minimum guidelines; however, none of these standards may fall below those set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).[19]

Permitting a landfill generally takes between five and seven years, costs millions of dollars and requires rigorous siting, engineering and environmental studies and demonstrations to ensure local environmental and safety concerns are satisfied.[20]

Types

[edit]

Microbial topics

[edit]

The status of a landfill's microbial community may determine its digestive efficiency.[23]

Bacteria that digest plastic have been found in landfills.[24]

Reclaiming materials

[edit]

One can treat landfills as a viable and abundant source of materials and energy. In the developing world, waste pickers often scavenge for still-usable materials. In commercial contexts, companies have also discovered landfill sites, and many[quantify] have begun harvesting materials and energy.[25] Well-known examples include gas-recovery facilities.[26] Other commercial facilities include waste incinerators which have built-in material recovery. This material recovery is possible through the use of filters (electro filter, active-carbon and potassium filter, quench, HCl-washer, SO2-washer, bottom ash-grating, etc.).

Alternatives

[edit]

In addition to waste reduction and recycling strategies, there are various alternatives to landfills, including waste-to-energy incineration, anaerobic digestion, composting, mechanical biological treatment, pyrolysis and plasma arc gasification. Depending on local economics and incentives, these can be made more financially attractive than landfills.

The goal of the zero waste concept is to minimize landfill volume.[27]

Restrictions

[edit]

Countries including Germany, Austria, Sweden,[28] Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, have banned the disposal of untreated waste in landfills.[citation needed] In these countries, only certain hazardous wastes, fly ashes from incineration or the stabilized output of mechanical biological treatment plants may still be deposited.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Also known as a tip, dump, rubbish tip, rubbish dump, garbage dump, trash dump, or dumping ground.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Waste Management. Background information. General objectives of waste policy" (PDF). www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Retrieved May 10, 2024.
  2. ^ a b "How a Landfill Operates". www.co.cumberland.nc.us. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  3. ^ "Alternative Daily Cover (ADC)". Archived from the original on June 5, 2012. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
  4. ^ a b Letcher, T.M.; Vallero, D.A., eds. (2019). Municipal Landfill, D. Vallero and G. Blight, pp. 235–249 in Waste: A Handbook for Management. Amsterdam, Netherlands and Boston MA, Print Book: Elsevier Academic Press. ISBN 9780128150603. 804 pages.
  5. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Landfill bioreactor performance: second interim report: outer loop recycling & disposal facility - Louisville, Kentucky, EPA/600/R-07/060
  6. ^ Weitz, Keith; Barlaz, Morton; Ranjithan, Ranji; Brill, Downey; Thorneloe, Susan; Ham, Robert (July 1999). "Life Cycle Management of Municipal Solid Waste". The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 4 (4): 195–201. Bibcode:1999IJLCA...4..195W. doi:10.1007/BF02979496. ISSN 0948-3349. S2CID 108698198.
  7. ^ US EPA, "Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria; Proposed Rule", Federal Register 53(168):33314–33422, 40 CFR Parts 257 and 258, US EPA, Washington, D.C., August 30 (1988a).
  8. ^ a b Themelis, Nickolas J., and Priscilla A. Ulloa. "Methane generation in landfills." Renewable Energy 32.7 (2007), 1243–1257
  9. ^ "CO2 101: Why is carbon dioxide bad?". Mother Nature Network. Retrieved November 30, 2016.
  10. ^ "How does landfill and litter affect our wildlife?". MY ZERO WASTE. January 30, 2009. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  11. ^ "Landfills are Ruining Lives". www.cdenviro.com. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  12. ^ Powell, Jon T.; Townsend, Timothy G.; Zimmerman, Julie B. (September 21, 2015). "Estimates of solid waste disposal rates and reduction targets for landfill gas emissions". Nature Climate Change. 6 (2): 162–165. doi:10.1038/nclimate2804.
  13. ^ "U.S. Landfills Are Getting a Second Life as Solar Farms". TIME. June 2, 2022.
  14. ^ "Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks | ontario.ca". www.ontario.ca.
  15. ^ "Aging Landfills: Ontario's Forgotten Polluterswork=Eco Issues". September 28, 2010. Archived from the original on September 28, 2010.
  16. ^ "CEWEP - The Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants".
  17. ^ a b "Fighting Mountains Of Garbage: Here Is How Indian Cities Dealt With Landfill Crisis In 2018 | Swachh Year Ender". NDTV. December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 21, 2020.
  18. ^ Cassella, Carly (June 5, 2019). "India's 'Mount Everest' of Trash Is Growing So Fast, It Needs Aircraft Warning Lights". ScienceAlert. Retrieved February 21, 2020.
  19. ^ Horinko, Marianne, Cathryn Courtin. "Waste Management: A Half Century of Progress." EPA Alumni Association. March 2016.
  20. ^ "Modern landfills". Archived from the original on February 22, 2015. Retrieved February 21, 2015.
  21. ^ EPA, OSWER, ORCR, US (March 24, 2016). "Basic Information about Landfills". www.epa.gov. Retrieved March 14, 2017.cite web: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ "Disposal and Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Waste". United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 19, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2017.
  23. ^ Gomez, A.M.; Yannarell, A.C.; Sims, G.K.; Cadavid-Resterpoa, G.; Herrera, C.X.M. (2011). "Characterization of bacterial diversity at different depths in the Moravia Hill Landfill site at Medellín, Colombia". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 43 (6): 1275–1284. Bibcode:2011SBiBi..43.1275G. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.018.
  24. ^ Gwyneth Dickey Zaikab (March 2011). "Marine microbes digest plastic". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2011.191.
  25. ^ "Sinologie Spectrum". www.chinalize.nl. Archived from the original on December 8, 2009.
  26. ^ "Commercial exploitation of gas from landfills". Archived from the original on October 24, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2009.
  27. ^ Qi, Shiyue; Chen, Ying; Wang, Xuexue; Yang, Yang; Teng, Jingjie; Wang, Yongming (March 2024). "Exploration and practice of "zero-waste city" in China". Circular Economy. 3 (1). doi:10.1016/j.cec.2024.100079.
  28. ^ "Regeringskansliets rättsdatabaser". rkrattsbaser.gov.se (in Swedish). Retrieved May 9, 2019.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]

 

American Cancer Society offices in Washington, D.C.

A charitable organization[1] or charity is an organization whose primary objectives are philanthropy and social well-being (e.g. educational, religious or other activities serving the public interest or common good).

The legal definition of a charitable organization (and of charity) varies between countries and in some instances regions of the country. The regulation, the tax treatment, and the way in which charity law affects charitable organizations also vary. Charitable organizations may not use any of their funds to profit individual persons or entities.[2] However, some charitable organizations have come under scrutiny for spending a disproportionate amount of their income to pay the salaries of their leadership.

The second-hand shop of UFF (U-landshjälp från Folk till Folk i Finland), a non-profit and non-governmental humanitarian foundation,[3] in Jyväskylä, Finland

Financial figures (e.g. tax refund, revenue from fundraising, revenue from the sale of goods and services or revenue from investment) are indicators to assess the financial sustainability of a charity, especially to charity evaluators. This information can impact a charity's reputation with donors and societies, and thus the charity's financial gains.

Charitable organizations often depend partly on donations from businesses. Such donations to charitable organizations represent a major form of corporate philanthropy.[4]

To meet the exempt organizational test requirements, a charity has to be exclusively organized and operated,[1] and to receive and pass the exemption test, a charitable organization must follow the public interest and all exempt income should be for the public interest.[1] For example, in many countries of the Commonwealth, charitable organizations must demonstrate that they provide a public benefit.[5]

History

[edit]

Early systems

[edit]

Until the mid-18th century, charity was mainly distributed through religious structures (such as the English Poor Laws of 1601), almshouses, and bequests from the rich. Christianity, Judaism, and Islam incorporated significant charitable elements from their very beginnings,[6] and dāna (alms-giving) has a long tradition in Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. Charities provided education, health, housing, and even prisons. Almshouses were established throughout Europe in the Early Middle Ages to provide a place of residence for the poor, old, and distressed people; King Athelstan of England (reigned 924–939) founded the first recorded almshouse in York in the 10th century.[7]

Enlightenment charity

[edit]
The Foundling Hospital, whose building has been demolished

During the Enlightenment era, charitable and philanthropic activity among voluntary associations and affluent benefactors became a widespread cultural practice. Societies, gentlemen's clubs, and mutual associations began to flourish in England, with the upper classes increasingly adopting a philanthropic attitude toward the disadvantaged. In England, this new social activism led to the establishment of charitable organizations, which proliferated from the middle of the 18th century.[8]

This emerging upper-class trend for benevolence resulted in the incorporation of the first charitable organizations. Appalled by the number of abandoned children living on the streets of London, Captain Thomas Coram set up the Foundling Hospital in 1741 to care for these unwanted orphans in Lamb's Conduit Fields, Bloomsbury. This institution, the world's first of its kind,[9] served as the precedent for incorporated associational charities in general.[10]

Painting by Antoine-Alexandre Morel (1765–1829) depicting charity during the Enlightenment era

Another notable philanthropist of the Enlightenment era, Jonas Hanway, established The Marine Society in 1756 as the first seafarers' charity, aiming to aid the recruitment of men into the navy.[11] By 1763, the Society had enlisted over 10,000 men, and an Act of Parliament incorporated it in 1772. Hanway also played a key role in founding the Magdalen Hospital to rehabilitate prostitutes. These organizations were funded by subscriptions and operated as voluntary associations. They raised public awareness about their activities through the emerging popular press and generally enjoyed high social regard. Some charities received state recognition in the form of a royal charter.

Charities also began to take on campaigning roles, championing causes and lobbying the government for legislative changes. This included organized campaigns against the mistreatment of animals and children, as well as the successful campaign in the early 19th century to end the slave trade throughout the British Empire and its extensive sphere of influence.[12] (However, this process was quite lengthy, concluding when slavery in Saudi Arabia was abolished slavery in 1962.)

The Enlightenment era also witnessed a growing philosophical debate between those advocating for state intervention and those believing that private charities should provide welfare. The political economist, Reverend Thomas Malthus (1766–1834), criticized poor relief for paupers on economic and moral grounds and proposed leaving charity entirely to the private sector.[13] His views became highly influential and informed the Victorian laissez-faire attitude toward state intervention for the poor.

Growth during the 19th century

[edit]

During the 19th century, a profusion of charitable organizations emerged to alleviate the awful conditions of the working class in the slums. The Labourer's Friend Society, chaired by Lord Shaftesbury in the United Kingdom in 1830, aimed to improve working-class conditions. It promoted, for example, the allotment of land to laborers for "cottage husbandry", which later became the allotment movement. In 1844, it became the first Model Dwellings Company – one of a group of organizations that sought to improve the housing conditions of the working classes by building new homes for them, all the while receiving a competitive rate of return on any investment. This was one of the first housing associations, a philanthropic endeavor that flourished in the second half of the nineteenth century, brought about by the growth of the middle class. Later associations included the Peabody Trust (originating in 1862) and the Guinness Trust (founded in 1890). The principle of philanthropic intention with capitalist return was given the label "five percent philanthropy".[14]

Andrew Carnegie's philanthropy. Puck magazine cartoon by Louis Dalrymple, 1903.

There was strong growth in municipal charities. The Brougham Commission led to the Municipal Corporations Act 1835, which reorganized multiple local charities by incorporating them into single entities under supervision from the local government.

Charities at the time, including the Charity Organization Society (established in 1869), tended to discriminate between the "deserving poor", who would be provided with suitable relief, and the "underserving" or "improvident poor", who was regarded as the cause of their woes due to their idleness. Charities tended to oppose the provision of welfare by the state, due to the perceived demoralizing effect. Although minimal state involvement was the dominant philosophy of the period, there was still significant government involvement in the form of statutory regulation and even limited funding.[15]

Philanthropy became a very fashionable activity among the expanding middle classes in Britain and America. Octavia Hill (1838–1912) and John Ruskin (1819–1900) were important forces behind the development of social housing, and Andrew Carnegie (1835–1919) exemplified the large-scale philanthropy of the newly rich in industrialized America. In Gospel of Wealth (1889), Carnegie wrote about the responsibilities of great wealth and the importance of social justice. He established public libraries throughout English-speaking countries[16] and contributed large sums to schools and universities.[17] A little over ten years after his retirement, Carnegie had given away over 90% of his fortune.[18]

Towards the end of the 19th century, with the advent of the New Liberalism and the innovative work of Charles Booth in documenting working-class life in London, attitudes towards poverty began to change. This led to the first social liberal welfare reforms, including the provision of old age pensions[19] and free school-meals.[20]

Since 1901

[edit]

During the 20th century, charitable organizations such as Oxfam (established in 1947), Care International, and Amnesty International expanded greatly, becoming large, multinational non-governmental organizations with very large budgets.

Since the 21st century

[edit]

With the advent of the Internet, charitable organizations established a presence on online social media platforms and began initiatives such as cyber-based humanitarian crowdfunding, exemplified by platforms like GoFundMe.

By jurisdiction

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

The definition of charity in Australia is derived from English common law, originally from the Charitable Uses Act 1601, and then through several centuries of case law based upon it. In 2002, the federal government initiated an inquiry into the definition of a charity. The inquiry proposed a statutory definition of a charity, based on the principles developed through case law. This led to the Charities Bill 2003, which included limitations on the involvement of charities in political campaigning, an unwelcome departure from the case law as perceived by many charities. The government appointed a Board of Taxation inquiry to consult with charities on the bill. However, due to widespread criticism from charities, the government abandoned the bill.

Subsequently, the government introduced the Extension of Charitable Purpose Act 2004. This act did not attempt to codify the definition of a charitable purpose but rather aimed to clarify that certain purposes were charitable, resolving legal doubts surrounding their charitable status. Among these purposes were childcare, self-help groups, and closed/contemplative religious orders.[21]

To publicly raise funds, a charity in Australia must register in each Australian jurisdiction in which it intends to raise funds. For example, in Queensland, charities must register with the Queensland Office of Fair Trading.[22] Additionally, any charity fundraising online must obtain approval from every Australian jurisdiction that mandates such approval. Currently, these jurisdictions include New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania, Western Australia, and the Australian Capital Territory. Numerous Australian charities have appealed to federal, state, and territory governments to establish uniform legislation enabling charities registered in one state or territory to raise funds in all other Australian jurisdictions.

The Australian Charities and Not-For-Profits Commission (ACNC) commenced operations in December 2012. It regulates approximately 56,000 non-profit organizations with tax-exempt status, along with around 600,000 other NPOs in total, seeking to standardize state-based fund-raising laws.[23]

A Public Benevolent Institution (PBI) is a specific type of charity with its primary purpose being to alleviate suffering in the community, whether due to poverty, sickness, or disability. Examples of institutions that might qualify include hospices, providers of subsidized housing, and certain not-for-profit aged care services.[24][25]

Canada

[edit]

Charities in Canada need to be registered with the Charities Directorate[26] of the Canada Revenue Agency. According to the Canada Revenue Agency:[27]

A registered charity is an organization established and operated for charitable purposes. It must devote its resources to charitable activities. The charity must be a resident in Canada and cannot use its income to benefit its members. A charity also has to meet a public benefit test. To qualify under this test, an organization must show that:

  • its activities and purposes provide a tangible benefit to the public.
  • those eligible for benefits are either the public as a whole or a significant section of it. They should not be a restricted group or one where members share a private connection, such as social clubs or professional associations with specific memberships.
  • the charity's activities must be legal and must not be contrary to public policy.

To register as a charity, the organization has to be either incorporated or governed by a legal document called a trust or a constitution. This document has to explain the organization's purposes and structure.

France

[edit]

Most French charities are registered under the statute of loi d'association de 1901, a type of legal entity for non-profit NGOs. This statute is extremely common in France for any type of group that wants to be institutionalized (sports clubs, book clubs, support groups...), as it is very easy to set up and requires very little documentation. However, for an organization under the statute of loi 1901 to be considered a charity, it has to file with the authorities to come under the label of "association d'utilité publique", which means "NGO acting for the public interest". This label gives the NGO some tax exemptions.[citation needed]

Hungary

[edit]

In Hungary, charitable organizations are referred to as "public-benefit organizations" (Hungarian: közhasznú szervezet). The term was introduced on 1 January 1997 through the Act on Public Benefit Organizations.[28]

India

[edit]

Under Indian law, legal entities such as charitable organizations, corporations, and managing bodies have been given the status of "legal persons" with legal rights, such as the right to sue and be sued, and the right to own and transfer property.[29] Indian charitable organizations with this status include Sir Ratan Tata Trust.

Ireland

[edit]

In Ireland, the Charities Act (2009) legislated the establishment of a "Charities Regulatory Authority", and the Charities Regulator was subsequently created via a ministerial order in 2014.[30][31] This was the first legal framework for charity registration in Ireland. The Charities Regulator maintains a database of organizations that have been granted charitable tax exemption—a list previously maintained by the Revenue Commissioners.[32] Such organizations would have a CHY number from the Revenue Commissioners, a CRO number from the Companies Registration Office, and a charity number from the Charities Regulator.

The Irish Nonprofits Database was created by Irish Nonprofits Knowledge Exchange (INKEx) to serve as a repository for regulatory and voluntarily disclosed information about Irish public benefit nonprofits.[citation needed]

Nigeria

[edit]

Charitable organizations in Nigeria are registerable under "Part C" of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020. Under the law, the Corporate Affairs Commission, Nigeria, being the official Nigerian Corporate Registry, is empowered to maintain and regulate the formation, operation, and dissolution of charitable organizations in Nigeria.[33] Charitable organizations in Nigeria are exempted under §25(c) of the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) Cap. C21 LFN 2004 (as amended), which exempts from income tax corporate organizations engaged wholly in ecclesiastical, charitable, or educational activities.[34] Similarly, §3 of the Value Added Tax Act (VATA) Cap. V1 LFN 2004 (as amended), and the 1st Schedule to the VATA on exempted Goods and Services goods zero-rates goods and services purchased by any ecclesiastical, charitable, or educational institutions in furtherance of their charitable mandates.

Poland

[edit]

A public benefit organization (Polish: organizacja pożytku publicznego, often abbreviated as OPP) is a term used in Polish law. It was introduced on 1 January 2004 by the statute on public good activity and volunteering. Charitable organizations of public good are allowed to receive 1.5% of income tax from individuals, making them "tax-deductible organizations". To receive such status, an organization has to be a non-governmental organization, with political parties and trade unions not qualifying. The organization must also be involved in specific activities related to the public good as described by the law, and it should demonstrate sufficient transparency in its activities, governance, and finances. Moreover, data has shown that this evidence is pertinent and sensible.

Polish charitable organizations with this status include ZwiÄ…zek Harcerstwa Polskiego, the Great Orchestra of Christmas Charity, KARTA Center, the Institute of Public Affairs, the Silesian Fantasy Club, the Polish Historical Society, and the Polish chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Singapore

[edit]

The legal framework in Singapore is regulated by the Singapore Charities Act (Chapter 37).[35] Charities in Singapore must be registered with the Charities Directorate of the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports.[36] One can also find specific organizations that are members of the National Council of Social Service (NCSS), which is operated by the Ministry of Social and Family Development.

Ukraine

[edit]

The legislation governing charitable activities and the process of obtaining charitable organization status is regulated by Ukraine's Civil Code and the Law of Ukraine on Charitable Activities and Charitable Organizations.

According to Ukrainian law, there are three forms of charitable organizations:

  • A "charitable society" is a charitable organization created by at least two founders and operates based on the charter or statute.
  • A "charitable institution" is a type of charitable trust that acts based on the constituent or founding act. This charitable organization's founding act defines the assets that one or several founders transfer to achieve the goals of charitable activity, along with any income from such assets. A constituent act of a charitable institution may be contained in a will or testament. The founder or founders of the charitable institution do not participate in the management of such a charitable organization.
  • A "charitable fund" or "charitable foundation" is a charitable organization that operates based on the charter, has participants or members, and is managed by them. Participants or members are not obliged to transfer any assets to such an organization to achieve the goals of charitable activity. A charitable foundation can be created by one or several founders. The assets of a charitable fund can be formed by participants and/or other benefactors.[citation needed]

The Ministry of Justice of Ukraine is the main registration authority for charitable organization registration and constitution.[37] Individuals and legal entities, except for public authorities and local governments, can be the founders of charitable organizations. Charitable societies and charitable foundations may have, in addition to founders, other participants who have joined them as prescribed by the charters of such charitable associations or charitable foundations. Aliens (non-Ukrainian citizens and legal entities, corporations, or non-governmental organizations) can be the founders and members of philanthropic organizations in Ukraine.

All funds received by a charitable organization and used for charitable purposes are exempt from taxation, but obtaining non-profit status from the tax authority is necessary.

Legalization is required for international charitable funds to operate in Ukraine.[clarification needed]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Charity law in the UK varies among (i) England and Wales, (ii) Scotland and (iii) Northern Ireland, but the fundamental principles are the same. Most organizations that are charities are required to be registered with the appropriate regulator for their jurisdiction, but significant exceptions apply so that many organizations are bona fide charities but do not appear on a public register.[38] The registers are maintained by the Charity Commission for England and Wales and by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator for Scotland. The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland maintains a register of charities that have completed formal registration (see below). Organizations applying must meet the specific legal requirements summarized below, have filing requirements with their regulator, and are subject to inspection or other forms of review. The oldest charity in the UK is The King's School, Canterbury, established in 597 AD.[39]

Charitable organizations, including charitable trusts, are eligible for a complex set of reliefs and exemptions from taxation in the UK. These include reliefs and exemptions in relation to income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, stamp duty land tax, and value added tax. These tax exemptions have led to criticisms that private schools are able to use charitable status as a tax avoidance technique rather than offering a genuine charitable good.[40]

The Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Act 2014 subjects charities to regulation by the Electoral Commission in the run-up to a general election.[41]

England and Wales

[edit]
Definition
[edit]

Section 1 of the Charities Act 2011 provides the definition in England and Wales:

(1) For the purposes of the law of England and Wales, "charity" means an institution which—
(a) is established for charitable purposes only, and
(b) falls to be subject to the control of the High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction with respect to charities.

The Charities Act 2011 provides the following list of charitable purposes:[42]

  1. the prevention or relief of poverty
  2. the advancement of education
  3. the advancement of religion
  4. the advancement of health or the saving of lives
  5. the advancement of citizenship or community development
  6. the advancement of the arts, culture, heritage or science
  7. the advancement of amateur sport
  8. the advancement of human rights, conflict resolution or reconciliation or the promotion of religious or racial harmony or equality and diversity
  9. the advancement of environmental protection or improvement
  10. the relief of those in need, by reason of youth, age, ill-health, disability, financial hardship or other disadvantage
  11. the advancement of animal welfare
  12. the promotion of the efficiency of the armed forces of the Crown or of the police, fire and rescue services or ambulance services
  13. other purposes currently recognized as charitable and any new charitable purposes which are similar to another charitable purpose.

A charity must also provide a public benefit.[43]

Before the Charities Act 2006, which introduced the definition now contained in the 2011 Act, the definition of charity arose from a list of charitable purposes in the Charitable Uses Act 1601 (also known as the Statute of Elizabeth), which had been interpreted and expanded into a considerable body of case law. In Commissioners for Special Purposes of Income Tax v. Pemsel (1891), Lord McNaughten identified four categories of charity which could be extracted from the Charitable Uses Act and which were the accepted definition of charity prior to the Charities Act 2006:

  1. the relief of poverty,
  2. the advancement of education,
  3. the advancement of religion, and
  4. other purposes considered beneficial to the community.

Charities in England and Wales—such as Age UK, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)[44] and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA)[45] – must comply with the 2011 Act regulating matters such as charity reports and accounts and fundraising.

Structures
[edit]

As of 2011, there are several types of legal structures for a charity in England and Wales:

  • Unincorporated association
  • Trust
  • Company limited by guarantee
  • Another incorporation, such as by royal charter
  • Charitable incorporated organization

The unincorporated association is the most common form of organization within the voluntary sector in England and Wales.[46] This is essentially a contractual arrangement between individuals who have agreed to come together to form an organization for a particular purpose. An unincorporated association will normally have a constitution or set of rules as its governing document, which will deal with matters such as the appointment of office bearers and the rules governing membership. The organization is not, however, a separate legal entity, so it cannot initiate legal action, borrow money, or enter into contracts in its own name. Its officers can be personally liable if the charity is sued or has debts.[47]

A trust is essentially a relationship among three parties: the donor of some assets, the trustees who hold the assets, and the beneficiaries (those eligible to benefit from the charity). When the trust has charitable purposes and is a charity, the trust is known as a charitable trust. The governing document is the trust deed or declaration of trust, which comes into operation once signed by all the trustees. The main disadvantage of a trust is that, like an unincorporated association, it lacks a separate legal entity, and the trustees must themselves own property and enter into contracts. The trustees are also liable if the charity is sued or incurs liability.

A company limited by guarantee is a private limited company where members' liability is limited. A guarantee company does not have a share capital, but instead has members who are guarantors rather than shareholders. If the company is wound up, the members agree to pay a nominal sum, which can be as little as £1. A company limited by guarantee is a useful structure for a charity where trustees need limited liability protection. Moreover, the charity has legal personality and can enter into contracts, such as employment contracts, in its own name.[48]

A small number of charities are incorporated by royal charter, a document that creates a corporation with legal personality (or, in some cases, transforms a charity incorporated as a company into a charity incorporated by royal charter). The charter must be approved by the Privy Council before receiving royal assent. While the nature of the charity will vary depending on the clauses enacted, a royal charter generally offers a charity the same limited liability as a company and the ability to enter into contracts.

The Charities Act 2006 introduced a new legal form of incorporation designed specifically for charities—the charitable incorporated organization (CIO)—with powers similar to a company but without the need to register as a company. Becoming a CIO was only made possible in 2013, with staggered introduction dates, with the charities with the highest turnover eligible first.

The term foundation is not commonly used in England and Wales. Occasionally, a charity will use the word as part of its name (e.g., British Heart Foundation), but this has no legal significance and provides no information about the charity's work or legal structure. The organization's structure will fall into one of the types described above.

Registration
[edit]

Charitable organizations with an income of over £5,000 and subject to the law of England and Wales must register with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, unless they are an "exempt" or "excepted" charity.[49][50] For companies, the law of England and Wales will usually apply if the company itself is registered in England and Wales. In other cases, if the governing document doesn't specify, the law that applies will be the one most connected with the organization.[51]

When an organization's income doesn't exceed £5,000, it can't register as a charity with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, unless registered as a Charitable Incorporated Organisation, in which case there is no minimum annual income.[52] With the increase in the mandatory registration level to £5,000 by The Charities Act 2006, smaller charities can rely on HMRC recognition to demonstrate their charitable purpose and confirm their not-for-profit principles.[53]

Churches with an annual income of less than £100,000 need not register.[54]

Some charities, referred to as exempt charities, aren't required to register with the Charity Commission and aren't subject to its supervisory powers. These charities include most universities and national museums, as well as some other educational institutions. Other charities are excepted from the need to register but are still subject to the supervision of the Charity Commission. The regulations on excepted charities were changed by the Charities Act 2006. Many excepted charities are religious charities.[55]

Northern Ireland

[edit]

The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland was established in 2009[56] and has received the names and details of over 7,000 organizations in Northern Ireland that have previously been granted charitable status for tax purposes (the "deemed list"). Compulsory registration of organizations from the deemed list began in December 2013, and it is expected to take three to four years to complete.[57] The new Register of Charities is publicly available on the CCNI website and contains the details of those organizations that have so far been confirmed by the commission to exist for charitable purposes and the public benefit. The Commission estimates that between 5,000 and 11,500 charitable organizations need to be formally registered in total.[58]

Scotland

[edit]

The approximately 24,000 charities in Scotland are registered with the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR), which also maintains a register of charities online.

United States

[edit]
Total giving USA: 1979–2011

In the United States, a charitable organization is an organization operated for purposes that are beneficial to the public interest.[59] There are different types of charitable organizations. Every U.S. and foreign charity that qualifies as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is considered a "private foundation" unless it demonstrates to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that it falls into another category. Generally, any organization that is not a private foundation (i.e., it qualifies as something else) is usually a public charity as described in Section 509(a) of the IRC.[60]

In addition, a private foundation usually derives its principal funding from an individual, family, corporation, or some other single source, and it is more often than not a grantmaker that does not solicit funds from the public. In contrast, a foundation or public charity generally receives grants from individuals, government, and private foundations. While some public charities engage in grantmaking activities, most conduct direct service or other tax-exempt activities. Foundations that are generally grantmakers (i.e., they use their endowment to make grants to other organizations, which in turn carry out the goals of the foundation indirectly) are usually called "grantmaker" or "non-operating" foundations.[citation needed]

The requirements and procedures for forming charitable organizations vary from state to state, as do the registration and filing requirements for charitable organizations that conduct charitable activities, solicit charitable contributions, or hire professional fundraisers.[61][62] In practice, the detailed definition of a "charitable organization" is determined by the requirements of state law where the charitable organization operates, and the requirements for federal tax relief by the IRS.

Resources exist to provide information, including rankings, of US charities.[63]

Federal tax relief

[edit]

Federal tax law provides tax benefits to nonprofit organizations recognized as exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the IRC. The benefits of 501(c)(3) status include exemption from federal income tax as well as eligibility to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions. In 2017, there were a total of $281.86 billion in tax-deductible donations by individuals.[64]

To qualify for 501(c)(3) status, most organizations must apply to the IRS for such status.[65]

Several requirements must be met for a charitable organization to obtain 501(c)(3) status. These include the organization being organized as a corporation, trust, or unincorporated association. The organization's organizing document (such as the articles of incorporation, trust documents, or articles of association) must limit its purposes to being charitable and permanently dedicate its assets to charitable purposes. The organization must refrain from undertaking a number of other activities, such as participating in the political campaigns of candidates for local, state, or federal office. Additionally, the organization must ensure that its earnings do not benefit any individual.[59] Most tax-exempt organizations are required to file annual financial reports (IRS Form 990) at the state and federal level. A tax-exempt organization's Form 990 and some other forms are required to be made available for public scrutiny.

The types of charitable organizations that the IRS considers to be organized for the public benefit include those organized for:

  • Relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged
  • Advancement of religion
  • Advancement of education or science
  • Construction or maintenance of public buildings, monuments, or works
  • Lessening the burdens of government
  • Lessening neighborhood tensions
  • Elimination of prejudice and discrimination
  • Defense of human and civil rights secured by law
  • Combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency.[59]

A number of other organizations may also qualify for exempt status, including those organized for religious, scientific, literary, and educational purposes, as well as those for testing for public safety and for fostering national or international amateur sports competition, and for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.

Criticism

[edit]

The charity has received various criticisms, for example:

  • Charities sometimes give aid conditionally,[66] through eligibility requirements such as sobriety, piety, curfews, participation in job training or parenting courses, cooperation with the police, or identifying the paternity of children, charity models enforce the concept that only those who can prove their moral worth deserve help, motivating citizens to accept exploitative wages or conditions to avoid being subject to the charitable system.[citation needed]
  • Charity is increasingly privatized and contracted out to the massive nonprofit sector, where organizations compete for grants to address social problems. Donors can protect their money from taxation by storing it in foundations that fund their pet projects, most of which have nothing to do with poor people.[67]

Economist Robert Reich criticized the practice of billionaires giving some of their money to charity, calling it mostly "self-serving rubbish".[further explanation needed][68] Mathew Snow of American socialist magazine Jacobin criticized charity for "creating an individualized 'culture of giving'" instead of "challenging capitalism's institutionalized taking."[69]

Charity fraud

[edit]
Charity fraud, also known as a donation scam, is the act of using deception to obtain money from people who believe they are donating to a charity. Often, individuals or groups will present false information claiming to be a charity or associated with one, and then ask potential donors for contributions to this non-existent charity. Charity fraud encompasses not only fictitious charities but also deceptive business practices. These deceitful acts by businesses may involve accepting donations without using the funds for their intended purposes or soliciting funds under false pretenses of need.

Charity regulators

[edit]
  • Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission
  • Canada Revenue Agency
  • Charity Commission for England and Wales
  • Charity Commission for Northern Ireland
  • Inland Revenue Department (Hong Kong)
  • Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator
  • United States Internal Revenue Service

See also

[edit]
  • Aid agency
  • Benefit corporation
  • Charitable trust
  • Charity watchdog
  • Community organization
  • Community organizing
  • Cy-près doctrine
  • Foundation
  • Fundraising
  • Grants
  • Nonprofit organization
  • Service club
  • Governance
  • Social enterprise
  • Mutual aid, alternative to charity
  • World Giving Index
  • List of charities accused of ties to terrorism

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Reiling, Herman T. (1958). "Federal Taxation: What Is a Charitable Organization?". American Bar Association Journal. 44 (6): 525–598. JSTOR 25720402.
  2. ^ "Exemption Requirements – 501(c)(3) Organizations". Internal Revenue Service. 28 November 2018.
  3. ^ "UFF – Official Site". Archived from the original on 2021-08-19. Retrieved 2021-08-19.
  4. ^ Tilcsik, A.; Marquis, C. (2013). "Punctuated Generosity: How Mega-events and Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Philanthropy in U.S. Communities". Administrative Science Quarterly. 58 (1): 111–148. doi:10.1177/0001839213475800. S2CID 18481039. SSRN 2028982.
  5. ^ Jonathan Garton (2013), Public Benefit in Charity Law, OUP Oxford.
  6. ^ Note, for example, Acts 2:44–45: "And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need." Zakāt (charity) ranks as one of the Five Pillars of Islam.
  7. ^ "The Almshouse Association: A Historical Summary". Archived from the original on 2013-08-25. Retrieved 2013-10-09.
  8. ^ "Associational Charities". Through the middle decades of the eighteenth century, a slew of new-style charities were created. They were directed at specific social problems (foundling children, prostitutes, venereal disease), funded by subscription, dependent on public support, and organized as associations of the living.
  9. ^ "Thomas Coram (1688–1751)". Archived from the original on 2016-12-25. Retrieved 2013-10-09.
  10. ^ "Captain Coram and the Foundling Hospital". The result was the first children's charity in the country and one that 'set the pattern for incorporated associational charities' in general (McClure 248).
  11. ^ N. A. M. Rodger, The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain 1649–1815 (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004), 313.
  12. ^ Luddy, Maria (1988-01-01). "Women and charitable organizations in the nineteenth century Ireland". Women's Studies International Forum. 11 (4): 301–305. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(88)90068-4. ISSN 0277-5395.
  13. ^ T. R. Malthus (28 August 1992). Malthus: 'An Essay on the Principle of Population'. Cambridge University Press. p. x. ISBN 978-0-521-42972-6. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
  14. ^ Tarn, J.N. (1973) Five Percent Philanthropy. London: CUP
  15. ^ "st george-in-the-east – St George-in-the-East PCC – Charity Number 1133761". stgeorgeintheeast.withtank.com. Retrieved 2020-01-31.
  16. ^ Van Slyck, Abigail A. (1991). "'The Utmost Amount of Effectiv [sic] Accommodation': Andrew Carnegie and the Reform of the American Library". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 50 (4): 359–383. doi:10.2307/990662. JSTOR 990662.
  17. ^ "Andrew Carnegie". Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy. Retrieved 2019-04-10.
  18. ^ "Andrew Carnegie, Philanthropist". www.americaslibrary.gov. Retrieved 2020-01-31.
  19. ^ "Charles Booth (1840–1916) – a biography (Charles Booth Online Archive)". lse.ac.uk.
  20. ^ "Rediscovering Charity: Defining Our Role with the State".[permanent dead link]
  21. ^ "Extension of Charitable Purpose Bill 2004 (Bills Digest, no. 164, 2003–04)" (PDF). Australia: Department of Parliamentary Services. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-03-29. Retrieved 2009-07-25.
  22. ^ "Charities". Queensland Government – Office of Fair Trading. Retrieved 2011-11-06.
  23. ^ "Fairfax Syndication Photo Print Sales and Content Licensing". licensing-publishing.nine.com.au. Retrieved 2020-01-31.
  24. ^ "Is your organisation a public benevolent institution?". Australian Taxation Office. 12 October 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2020.
  25. ^ "Charity subtypes". Australian Charities and Not-For-Profits Commission. 28 March 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2020.
  26. ^ "Charities and Giving". Canada Revenue Agency. Retrieved 2011-11-06.
  27. ^ "Registered Charity". Canada Revenue Agency. Retrieved 2009-07-25.
  28. ^ "1997. évi CLVI. törvény a közhasznú szervezetekrÅ‘l1".
  29. ^ Birds to holy rivers: A list of everything India considers "legal persons", Quartz (publication), September 2019. Archived 2019-11-09 at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ Charities Act 2009 (Act of the Oireachtas 6, section 13). Oireachtas Éireann (Parliament of Ireland). 2009.
  31. ^ Charities Act 2009 (Establishment Day) Order 2014 (Statutory Instrument 456). Minister for Justice and Equality. 2014.
  32. ^ "Charities and other Approved Bodies in Ireland under the Taxes Consolidation Act". Revenue Ireland. May 8, 2012. Archived from the original on June 1, 2012.
  33. ^ "Registration of Incorporated Trustees in Nigeria". Corporate Affairs Commission, Nigeria. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  34. ^ "Guidelines-On-The-Tax-Exemption-Status-Of (2)".
  35. ^ "Charities Act". Singapore Statutes Online. 31 October 2007.
  36. ^ "Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth". Retrieved 25 July 2015.
  37. ^ Thor, Anatoliy. "Legislation on charitable organization in Ukraine".
  38. ^ "Understanding charity status and registration". National Council for Voluntary Organisations. Registering with the Charity Commission. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
  39. ^ "Background to the Charities Act 2006". House of Commons. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  40. ^ Sparrow, Andrew (19 July 2012). "Labour could strip private schools of charitable status, says Stephen Twigg". The Guardian.
  41. ^ Harvey, Fiona; Asthana, Anushka (2017-06-06). "'Chilling' Lobbying Act stifles democracy, charities tell party chiefs". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-01-31.
  42. ^ "Charities Act 2011". legislation.gov.uk.
  43. ^ "Charity Commission: Charities and Public Benefit". Retrieved 2010-08-24.
  44. ^ "The RSPB Wildlife Charity: Nature Reserves & Wildlife Conservation". The RSPB. Retrieved 2020-01-31.
  45. ^ "Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals – RSPCA". RSPCA.org.uk. Archived from the original on 12 July 2008. Retrieved 11 June 2017.
  46. ^ "Seniors Network – Unincorporated Association". Archived from the original on April 23, 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  47. ^ "NCVO – Legal structures for voluntary organizations". Archived from the original on February 6, 2009. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  48. ^ "Guarantee Company – Not for Profit Companies – Charities". Archived from the original on September 15, 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  49. ^ "Exempt charities (CC23)". www.gov.uk. 1 September 2013.
  50. ^ "Excepted charities". www.gov.uk. 11 June 2014.
  51. ^ "How to set up a charity (CC21a)". GOV.UK. 4 November 2014.
  52. ^ "Charity registration". gov.uk.
  53. ^ "Charities and tax". hmrc.gov.uk.
  54. ^ "Nonprofit Law in England & Wales". Council on Foundations. 2013-11-24. Retrieved 2020-07-21.
  55. ^ "Charity Act 2006". Archived from the original on 2007-05-22. Retrieved 2008-08-21.
  56. ^ "Our status". The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. 2010. Retrieved 25 July 2017.
  57. ^ "The Deemed List". Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Retrieved 25 July 2017.
  58. ^ "Registration list and expression of intent form". www.charitycommissionni.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2017-07-28. Retrieved 2017-07-25.
  59. ^ a b c "Publication 557: Tax-Exempt Status for Your Organization Archived 2020-05-11 at the Wayback Machine". Internal Revenue Service. January 2018. p. 27.
  60. ^ FoundationCenter.org, What is the difference between a private foundation and a public charity? Archived 2009-08-31 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 2009-06-20
  61. ^ "NASCO National Association of State Charity Officials". Retrieved 2008-08-27.
  62. ^ "U.S. List of Charitable Solicitation Authorities by State". Archived from the original on January 27, 2014. Retrieved 2014-01-27.
  63. ^ Adriene Hill, "The worst charities: Get information before you make a donation Archived 2020-07-13 at the Wayback Machine", Marketplace, NPR, June 14, 2013
  64. ^ "The Ultimate List Of Charitable Giving Statistics For 2018".
  65. ^ "Applying for 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Status: Publication P4220" (PDF). IRS. March 2018.
  66. ^ "Arguments against charity". BBC. 2014. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
  67. ^ Spade, Dean (2020). "Solidarity not Charity" (PDF). Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  68. ^ Reich, Robert (2020-04-12). "America's billionaires are giving to charity – but much of it is self-serving rubbish". The Guardian. Retrieved 2022-03-21.
  69. ^ Snow, Mathew (2015-08-25). "Against Charity". Jacobin. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
[edit]
  • Media related to Charitable organizations at Wikimedia Commons
  • "Charities" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. V (9th ed.). 1878. pp. 401–402.

 

Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in New Hanover County


Driving Directions From K38 Baja Grill to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Double Happiness Chinese Restaurant to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Wilmington Riverwalk to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Bluethenthal Wildflower Preserve to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From Poplar Grove Plantation to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling
Driving Directions From The Children's Museum of Wilmington to The Dumpo Junk Removal & Hauling

Reviews for


Jennifer Davidson

(5)

Great work! Bryce and Adrian are great!

Greg Wallace

(5)

I highly recommend Dumpo Junk Removal. Very professional with great pricing and quality work.

Howard Asberry

(5)

The manager was very helpful, knowledgeable and forthright. He definitely knew what he was talking about and explained everything to me and was very helpful. I'm looking forward to working with him

Kirk Schmidt

(5)

They are great with junk removal. Highly recommend them

Kelly Vaughn

(5)

Great service with professionalism. You can't ask for more than that!

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Look for certifications such as R2 (Responsible Recycling), e-Stewards, or ISO 14001. These ensure that the recycler adheres to environmental and ethical standards.
Certification ensures that recyclers follow best practices for environmental protection, data security, and worker safety, reducing harm from improper disposal methods.
You can verify a recyclers certification by checking their credentials on the certifying bodys official website or requesting documentation directly from the recycler.
Yes, non-certified recyclers may improperly dispose of hazardous materials, leading to environmental damage and potential data breaches from unsecured devices.
Consider factors like transparency in processes, accountability measures, service offerings (e.g., pick-up services), customer reviews, and adherence to local regulations.